
Lutheran Surrealism occasionally pipes up against southeast Asian aggression whether it is toward the Buddhists of Tibet, or by the Buddhists of Myanmar's military state, where taking of sexual slaves by the military is a common feature of everyday life, and where ethnic cleansing along the lines practiced in the former Yugoslavia is official government policy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Burma
In the days to come Aung San Suu Kyi's fate will be decided. She is the 1991 Nobel Prize Winner who won an 82% landslide election in the early 90s in her presidential bid but was denied acess to the presidential office and instead was placed under house arrest for the last 16 years. That house arrest has now been changed to a new address in one of Myanmar's worst prisons. She may remain there in spite of worldwide protests pending the outcome of a trial due to end in a few days.
We deplore the lack of true justice of any kind in Myanmar, and wish that Henry Gates and President Obama would focus on something worthwhile for a change, and make a statement with regard to the Buddhist-Marxist nightmare of Myanmar instead of worrying about a police officer doing his job correctly in the comparatively legally-sane neighborhood of Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The American president seems to say almost nothing about Iran, and next to nothing about Myanmar, but goes on and on for days about a non-incident in Cambridge, in which a police officer tried to help an overpaid literary critic, but was rebuffed amidst taunts against his mama. The president castigated the wrong individual. But enough of that. There's a world outside of Harvard, and the president ought to also stand for freedom worldwide, and to promote human rights around the globe, especially where they are most egregiously absent.
44 comments:
hey Kirby Christian-surrealist
I just googled
"asian porn movies"
http://asiandemon.com/
what a crock of shit!
what are you doing about this ?
So I take it you would like Obama to bomb more poor people? Do you want to see tens of thousands of deaths in south east Asia now? Maybe he should go after them Catholics too (now that would be 'Lutheran Surrealism' in spades!) Is the current 'clash of civilisations' a bit of a let-down?
Now go get your pals to fine-pick the theological implications.
Obama would do well to focus on great moral imperatives that transcend cultural divides. Your comments here are right on.
WW
p.s. climbing Everest was changed to Spring next year. The wedding was pushed forward to last Sunday. Done deal.
wow everest
i'm impressed
almost jealous
but no, i know my limits
congrats on the wedding
looking forward
to a comment on LS
from the top of the world next spring
and thanks for the post kirby
it raised my consciousness level
i think aung san suu kyi
is just taking advantage of being an oppressed woman
i mean those girls get all the attention
what's wrong didn't she get enough attention as a girl and now has to go represent herself as a worldwide symbol of one who suffers injustice for justice' sake
maybe she's just grandstanding
she's trying to impress her father
who i suppose ignored her most her life
i just hope she doens't have to die
if she has to die at the hands of those who fear her
all hell will break loose
even the buddhists will take up guns
an undercover cop got into a fight with a young man here in lake woebgon this week who thought some jerk was pickin a fight with him the man slams the police guy to the ground and then sees the badge on his belt he steps away raises his hands the cop gets up and pumps three bullets into the kid 24 yrs old
america is not a police state yet but i don't think obama has called off the dogs all the security people with guns are primed to go after terrorists
and any one who flips off a cop i guess is a terrorist
it's good for a country when they have living martyrs
gives the people a sense of common rhetoric
but
maybe she's just trying too hard to get a husband
i mean c'mon she can't be that altruistic
i can't even imagine myanmar
i've rejected globalization
it's a postmodern deconstructionist myth
i dreamed i saw joe hill last night
we've not yet heard the last bird sing in myanmar
does a dead woman have buddha nature
i think they need a big carnival down there or a circus
ou about twenty thousand trashy summer films to play at once
take their minds off the political impossibilities
peace
sort of
not in this world
unless we try just a little harder
but that sounds too much like good works
let's just let almost everyone else kill one another and feel guilty for not having done something earlier
maybe she is a messiah for the people
a girl messiah
why can't people just try to get along with one another
sheesh
j
as of this june, nepal has installed internet access on everest...safety reasons.
but that also means I can Twitter from Everest.
Is this progress? Dunno.
WW
hey JH you say/sing
i dreamed i saw joe hill last night
on one of my hitch-hiking trips
across this country to The Left Coast then back across Caada... 1974-ish
thumb out and wearing my
Deringer Cuny-fur cowboy hat (Deringer was the guy who made the hats Stetson put his name on them... I got my hat in a shoppe in Elgin)
well this car goes by than stops on the shoulder and backs up
this girl says "I stopped for your hat. Get in."
well she takes me up into hills of Northern California/Southern OreUHgone near Cave Junction to an Hippie farm..
AND, she tells me her name
"Something" Hill..
said that she was Joe Hill's granddaughter!
Ananohmous/Ignored Ed
edanon
i do not doubt that joe hill fathered a few children
took solace in the arms of a woman now and again
but he was such a rambler
such an outlaw
such a smiling trouble maker
and clever wielder of music
a tune smith and punchy lyricist
i don't think he ever wrote a love song
but maybe i'm wrong
joe hills' granddaughter
well that means she's probably still alive and will maybe pick me up when i hitchhike out to montana later this summer late late summer almost fall
joe hill the swedeish griot with a social conscience
j
joe hill was a lutheran
stegner in the novel joe hill
portrays a really fine highly principled commonsense lutheran minnesoata pastor as the one who tries to talk a little religious sense into joe...to no avail
but joe was a lutheran
in salt lake city there is a catholic worker house
called joe hill house
bums like me can stay there for a few nights for free
i sing my own version of the song
j
I've heard that song about Joe Hill in a Joan Baez song or something. I will use Wikipedia.
Meanwhile, I discovered a young man at a college writing a sentient blog entry about Gates-Gate as it is now being called:
http://dantheman85x.blogspot.com/2009/07/keeping-racial-divides-intact.html?showComment=1248545851128#c2661809013554503197
He writes a fair and balanced piece, and brings in Cosby at the end.
Sometimes I think that Jacques is right that the conservatives will actually turn the corner on the radical left, and we'll see some decency again instead of racial and sexual winner takes all.
Ann Althouse is also writing some good stuff on Gates-Gate.
Nobody's writing about Aung Kyi much. I think personally it's a bigger story, but nobody wants to think about the bad Buddhists.
We want to pretend that America has all the problems, and everything is hunky dory every place else. Geez, even the most basic human rights are missing in most places in the world.
Aung Kyi's trials have been a joke. She's the actual elected president of Myanmar.
It's like if Obama won in America by a landslide some 30 percentage points bigger, and was placed in House Arrest for twenty years as a result.
And yet no one on the left seems to ever mention this.
China is the one paying for Myanmar's upkeep, and yet that's exactly where Henry Gates has been, but nobody even brings this up.
The left is taking all their cues from Maoism.
I'd prefer that we get back to Locke, and Keynes.
i just looked up the wikapedia deal on aung san suu kyi
i was struck with her beauty
i was moved to wonder if i could ever see her face in real life
it appears so beautiful
and i read the accounts of her life
so so strange
but yet the way some paths have to be hers appears to be a fight of genuine justice
makes my reactionary flippancy of late last night sound rather thin
i may be overweight but i can still stick my foot in my mouth
see
i do hope her cause pulls through
i do hope her voice shatters the stone hearts of the despots
and i think obama should say something about burma
their writing is so beautiful
their food is excellent
their sense of beauty is so rich and old
they should change and open up for awhile
they can go back to authoritarianiam in a 100 yrs or so
i will pray for aung san suu kyi
pray that her struggle spreads hope
she herself is a theravada buddhist
now that i think of it
this is a very big story
probably as simple as
how to more justly spread the wealth around
j
Joseph Estrada polled the largest number of votes ever in a Philippine presidential election and easily the biggest ever margin of victory, yet spent three of the five years of his term in prison awaiting a corruption trial that never reached a conclusion, following an impeachment trial that ended when it was clear the Senate lacked the votes to remove him from office. He was removed in a coup by media that culminated in a switch of allegiance by the military to the then vice-president who has now served eight years in office under a system that only allows five. Attending Yale with people like Bush and the Clintons is apparently all that's required to derail the democratic process. What school did Suu Kyi attend? Yale?
WW:
Congratulations on your marriage, and best of luck to you and your husband in your Himalayan climb in spring! Be safe, you two daredevils!
Kirby:
I know the martyrdom that Joe Hill enjoys from the hard left.
The IWW or "Wobblies" were hard-core communists, and engaged in numerous acts of sabotage, robbery, and violence especially in the Northwest US.
"Big" Bill Haywood, a vicious criminal who escaped from a US prison and who fled to his ideological home in the USSR was one of the leaders of this Red scum, some of whom were responsible for firing on unarmed American legionnaires during an Armistice Day parade in Centralia Washington in 1919 (four legionnaires, among them Legion Post Commander Warren Grimm, an All-American football player and graduate of the U of Washington, US Army officer, and well-known anti-bolshevik [thus probably receiving "special" attention from the communist assassins], were killed, and one Wobblie perp was subsequently lynched, others imprisoned).
Frank Little, another IWW communist agitator, met his end hanging from a railroad trestle at the literal end of a rope in Butte, Montana, where I spent an interesting year many decades ago. I located the very trestle on which FL was hanged.
i've been meaning to wrie a ballad of frank little
jh:
On Haywood, I'd attend his funeral, though just to make sure. Haywood narrowly beat an earlier murder rap with the aid of Clarence Darrow's cunning defense.
The Bill Ayres or Bernadine Dohrn of an earlier age, where communists and anarchists incited the so-called "Red Scare" (including a scary attempt to kill Attorney-General Palmer and his family).
Another example (among many others) of attempted murder and violence involved another Red, Alexander Berkman, and his mattress, Emma Goldman, who conspired to kill Henry Clay Frick, chairman of Carnegie Steel--Andrew Carnegie had already given away most of his money to charity and had retired to Scotland--and a noted philanthropist especially after the Johnstown Flood of 1889). Though twice seriously shot point-blank by Berkman, the unarmed Frick fought back and with help, subdued the raging Red and while shouting to the police to let the law handle this assassin--Berkman served only fourteen years, due to pressure by appreciatrive labour groups.
Of course I don't approve of lynching, but it's no wonder IWW communist provocations should be answered by violent acts of lawless vigilantes. That such people should be celebrated by hard-left, anti-American bitter-enders like entertainers Pete Seeger and Phony Joanie Baez is no surprise.
Merce Cunningham's father (Cunningham was the famous dancer associated with John Cage and others) was apparently the DA that prosecuted the Wobblies in Centralia.
It's funny. In the Wobbly lore they never say that the anarchists fired first. They make it seem that the lynching (by the balls) and other associated beatings were unprovoked.
It's funny that Kirby should pass himself off as the light of liberty and still thumb his nose at Henry Louis Gates. The bottom line in the Gates situation is that a man was arrested for mouthing off to a police officer. So decide whether or not you think it's OK for an American citizen to mouth off to a cop. That's the only issue at stake. It doesn't matter if Gates is black or white, nice or crazy, rich or poor. It doesn't matter if the cop is black or white or well-intentioned or whatever. All that is the case is that a cop felt it was legal and necessary to arrest someone who was calling him racist and mocking his mama and asking him to leave his property well after the mistake of the break-in was cleared up.
IF you describe this as mouthing off to an officer, ok, fine. But the officer felt he was creating a PUBLIC DISTURBANCE, so it wasn't about protecting himself, but about protecting the public.
But there is an enormous distinction between whites and blacks on this topic.
It's amazing to see the differences, just as in the OJ case.
The only prominent black man who has sided with the police is Bill Cosby.
I think the police deserve to be treated with deference and respect, but I don't think that's the issue here. I think Gates was so wound up over his profiling documentary, that he went wild, and saw the police officer in a framework that was inaccurate to the occasion.
And that he was yelping out of two centuries of misplaced pain.
It's a very complex case.
Thank you for writing in.
My regular readers don't seem to be at all interested in this topic.
Do you, Signifyin, think that the treatment that Gates got is more worthy of attention than the attention that Ms. Kyi should be receiving from our media?
Why or why not?
Hey, Signifyin' Monkey, Gates made a bloody fool of himself, and
President Obama stuck his Pinocchio-size nose in where it didn't belong--Savvy, half-man?
People in Centralia go to the biker bar to mix with the civilized people.
Signifying Monkey wrote:
"The bottom line in the Gates situation is that a man was arrested for mouthing off to a police officer."
No, the bottom line is that Gates then accused the officer of making a racially motivated arrest.
Gates brought in the race card.
Funny, because about a month ago here in San Diego, we had the "Francine Busby" incident.
A neighbor called police about a noise violation over a political fundraiser at a home in a residential neighborhood. The incident resulted in elderly women being sprayed with pepper spray and arrested.
Yet, throughout the controversy that ensued (local, not national) no one screamed gender or age discrimination. Certainly there were accusations of police abuse of power. But still, there was no default position of discrimination.
I've read as many accounts as I can of the Gates/Crowley encounter. Each could have walked away. Gates escalated the situation by continuing to berate Crowley with taunts and accusations of racial discrimination. Crowley could have walked away despite this.
If I were Crowley I would ignore the invitation to the White House for a beer with Obama and Gates. Until Gates can admit that he too played a part in the altercation, the invitation smacks of arrogance. Frankly Obama should distance himself immediately, or Gates will use the office of the US President to assert his own political agenda...that every little hoohaa that doesn't go his way will be elevated to racial discrimination. And that is sad, because crying wolf undermines all other attempts to address real discrimination, whether against blacks, women, or even whites.
WW
1. There is plenty of news coverage san suu kyi. I hear about it at least once a week on NPR.
2. Obama didn't "stick his nose" into anything. A reporter at a news conference raised the topic and raised the issue of Obama's friendship with Gates. Obama answered the question.
3. I refuse any equivalence between a citizen employing his First Amendment rights to spout whatever nonsense he chooses and a cop who overreacts to words. The cop is given a gun. If a cop cannot react soundly to an old man shouting, he certainly shouldn't have a gun.
4. Had the officer left as soon as Gates showed him his IDs, none of this would have gone down.
5. Shouting at a cop may be in bad taste, but it's not equivalent with wrongful arrest. The cop brought the full powers of the state down on an individual doing nothing illegal on his own property. Every lawyer in the world has said that even from the police report, a disorderly conduct charge was bogus.
6. I'd rather see Obama (and other nations' leaders) address human rights abuses with real action. I don't care if they pay lip service at press conferences.
kirby i think the wobblies were pretty savvy amongst themselves regarding who to trust with what a dn murder and thievery and tricksterdom were all a part of the game they knew the stakes were high they knew some folks paid with their lives it was a big ole american crap game dice rollin in the gutter...and there were guns
i wish to point to what i take to be a "security " issue in this country i see it everywhere security guys weightlifter guys martial arts guys waitin to kick ass everywhere and the visibility and the outright safety violence is getting out of hand it's too strange...i realize the necessity of law support at the level of human mayhem but this is a bit ridiculous
america is a land where shots are fired all the damn time it is a violent place
airports are chock full of them court houses streets i see cops everywhere patrolling
perhaps it is all an illusion of security
yet i am sure they clean up the rough edges of societal decay to some extent
i think the gates thing is a T V show...real life drama with everything in it police corruption excess race relations boring summers mind control guns and who knows what untoward nefarious activity goin on down the street
yeah
a tv show
nearing 4am
am tired
working out the kinks
trying to get things organized
trying not to hurt so bad
getting old is a wretched affair
hard to do it with a smile
there's surrealism for you pal
getting old
j
jacques
it amazes me that you don't have any sentiment worthy of the term good toward the efforts of poor people trying to make it in a very harsh land
are you suggesting that their hardships were esaggerated that they could have been more civil that they had no right to resist outright slavery when it was obvious that things could be better all the way around
to demand food
to demand shelter
one might argue that catholic nuns did more than anyone to quell the ardent zealotry of labor unions educating them young boys and girls to become good catholic citizens in a land of squalor and greed...it is often baffling to me that people assume such hard judgement upon the people actually struggling to overcome extraordinary oppression by the rich yes by the filthy rich
and there were plenty of them around...
i mena the rich are fine it's OK to have rich people throwing money around but
unless upton sinclair is just doing a little circus act i think the weight of blame has to be onthe wealthy and the powerful
in so many places there was plenty of money to direct to things like housing and sewage but the barons flitted it away on pipedreams
the other thing is
it's hard to sing ballads about the megalomaniacl corporate captians of the 20th century
the mad men who tore up the west and gutted and raped eveywhere they coould to mine the riches of an imagined land a land whose riches are far more frail and vulnerabel than are generally surmised
the activisits were flawed people wallace stegners representation of joe hill is clear testimony to that
but hey were also dedicated to soemthing good something that had to happen one way or another
there was going to be dignity for workers or there was going to be no industry it was as clear as that
and that they won forthemsleves most all of what they needed
(and perhaps it could be argued more than they needed)
one thing about pete seeger jacques my friend
he's never been tempted to think like you
he keeps his nose pretty close to the waters of the hudson
i know for a fact that pete never disparaged his understanding of free speech even when that right was taken from him (more or less)
anyway
woody guthrie saw things pretty well even with dust in his eyes
when it comes right down to it i far more admire the fact that very simple men worked their asses off for a meagre chance at life men who worked died and were forgotten
these men deserve more recognition than the big name money and smarts guys...it will always be the worker i admire...not so much the talented dreamer or the gold pocketed scheemer
i lift my glass to the laborers of this world
j
jh:
Sure, mate, I've read my Bloy with sympathy and--if you will-- profit, but his encomia to poverty as a singular Christ-like virtue didn't, as I recall, compel him to romanticise the worker (because we are poor, must we be vicious?) and whack a banjo in service of class war and world revolution, or have I misread him all these years, jh?
At any rate, I'm glad there wasn't a union where I worked 80 hr-a week shifts at a factory four summers successively so I could make my university tuition at the U of Montana in the 60s (though I was later a union shop steward for seven years in the SEIU in a union shop state, Orrygon--how 'bout you, mate?).
On Pete Seeger: ("Take a trip with me to nineteen-nineteen,/ to Midtown Manhattan and th' birth of Peetie . . ." to the tune of "The 1913 Massacre"). I know all those songs (of Woody Guthrie, Cisco Houston, Ray, Glover, and Koerner, The New Lost City Ramblers, Leadbelly, Memphis Minnie, Ramblin' Jack Elliot, Alan Lomax of Hahvahd--like Peetie, AKA "Stalin's Songbird"--worst voice in the world!, but an able song conservator--an' min' djou, WPA gu'mmint job--etc.), and I sing 'em (if I git m' lef' flipper back, play gee-tar, too). Wa'll, that I ken the songs don't mean I go lon' wif de politick--see?
Now, Mister Seeger wuz on th' wrong ahem, side of the Spanish Civil War, of course (he sides with the priest-killers and nun-rapers, AKA "Loyalists"), tho' in deference to his age now, perhaps deserving at best of our indifference, unlike the persecutorial zeal of the pack of French lefties who pursued the patriot Charles Maurras de l'Academie Francaise to his grave and beyond (requiescat in pacem, O Carole nobile!)! At any rate, Seeger the upper-middle-class Noo Yawk boy (now ol' boy) n' Hahvahd man dabbling in revolutionary politics to make hisself interesting may today be a passable rest-home busker, but a Caruso, Bjoerling, Lanza, or Pavarotti he's not, OK already?
Shucks jh, on the workers your heart's in the right place, but, a mon avis, "y' jes' ain't ga'cher min' drite." Love to split a pitcher with you sometime (leaving politics at the door, 'cause I'm a VFW and Legion man, see?--heard that wussy-pussy Garrison Keillor makin' fun of the VFW last week--sure like to have a private word with that boy, since he also banned me from his website--kinda like what Master Tom'd like Kirby to do on this site--euphemised as "managing your blog," right Tom? Trouble is, boy, Kirby n' me are fellow vets of leftie blog-banning, don't ch'a know?). jh, know any Newfoundland sea shanties or drinking songs? Yes or no, but surely: Cheers, camarado!
On Henry Louis "The Mouth" Gates, Jr: I used to live in Cambridge the Lesser (well, just inside, and pretty near the Davis Street tube station in Somerville, and down the street from Vinnie (or Vito, or Luigi, I can't remember) the Demo ward-heeler's, AKA "The Fixer"'s HQ), and I always thought the Cambridge police a pretty wimpy pc bunch (roarin' round the town in their mountain bikes, oblivious to hit-and-runs of pedestrians in crosswalks, like nearly everywhere on the East Coast--save New Hampshire and Maritime Canada), but I guess now and then they actually enforce the law, and (get this!) even against "Wolf!"-criers in bogus Hahvahd departments like Dr Gates, whose heart-tearin' cries of anguish to pc heaven are heard even as far as our Big Daddy-io in Washington! (BTW: Thank you for sharing, Dr Luther Blisset, and have a teacherly-appropriate day!)
I don't think all the lawyers in the world are on the side of Gates, as Luther implies. Ann Althouse for instance is a lawyer, and she has been posting many comments against Gates in her blog (linked at top right of my blog).
Many lawyers have weighed in on this case. Some think it's a slam dunk one way or the other.
But if Professor Gates was disorderly, as it is attested, and as presumably the arrest tape will reveal (it hasn't been released for some reason) then he did deserve to be arrested, or at least it's likely that the police would have reasonable cause to arrest the wayward professor screaming at the top of his lungs on the porch unfair and libelous things at the officer, and inciting others to unconstructive action.
Juan Williams, a black commentator on Fox News, opined last evening that he thought that Gates was in the wrong. Bill Cosby has also opined that he thought that the PRESIDENT himself was wrong to get involved in a local police matter without knowing the facts on the ground.
This is not a legal slam dunk.
But it's very clearly a divisive issue, much like the Sotomayor remark that she is one "wise Latina."
Racism goes two ways, and we have to get used to that.
It seems that Obama has surrounded himself with race hustlers from Jeremy Wright to Professor Gates, and he now will have to throw them one at a time under the bus if he wants to keep the majority on his bus (his ratings have plummeted below 50% for the first time, presumably due to his biased handling of Gates-Gate).
I don't think Luther is Wright to say that EVERY lawyer in the world is on the side of Gates.
All he has to do is link to Althouse and he'll find at least one prominent naysayer.
Althouse has been quoted approvingly by Rush Limbaugh.
I think some of these top journalists are also lawyers.
You find law degrees in unlikely places. Does Ann Coulter have a law degree? Some of the Fox newswomen do have law degrees. Not sure which. Does Greta? does Michelle Malkin?
They have streams of lawyers on there talking, and most of them disagree with Gates, and find him disagreeable if not legally out of line in libeling Crowley as a racist.
I think Gates's probably told some lies in this process. He claims he never talked about the police officer's mama, for instance. He claims that Crowley got this from some ancient show the officer would have been unlikely to even know about.
I think Gates was doing a documentary about this racial profiling topic, and decided to use this police officer as an example to dramatize his documentary. But he may have picked the wrong guy, and basically profiled the officer, which is a case of reverse discrimination!
It should be just as wrong for a professor to unfairly profile an officer as a racist and libel him at the top of his lungs and throughout the media. I think the officer has a stronger countersuit under the libel laws than Gates has, also because it was just a catch and release. They only kept Gates for four hours.
Maybe even the president is guilty of libeling the officer and the Cambridge Police department. I don't know the legality of this, though. Saying someone has acted "stupidly," may be only an opinion, and therefore is not factual enough to make it libel?
At any rate, perhaps the White House beer festival that has been proffered will quiet all this down.
Here's a video with two black police officers backing up Crowley. This footage hasn't been widely seen, but did originally appear on CNN, which is a fairly liberal station (the newscaster is black).
Take a look!
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2009/07/26/nr.comrade.in.arms.cnn?iref=
videosearch
I think it shows remarkable courage on the part of Officer Crowley's friends to stand up to the president, and say that they supported and voted for him, but would never do that again, because he's clearly a prejudiced man.
boxing gloves give gates and the cop boxing gloves let them go at it on live TV would'nt that be great just sitting there watching two old assholes box each other you know give them 3 minute rounds let them go at it then just boxing after boxing lots o fun in the summer watching boxing on TV nothing else to do summer slippin away watch boxing gates should box the cop on live TV that's what should happen
i'm sayin nothin will change unless the whole boston affair goes wildly public with developments going week after week and then at some point gates and the cop just decided to box it out on live TV as it were
i'd say if it hadn't been for this gates affair and the beerbash racial summit in the white house this summer would have gone by with michael jackson moonwalking into purgatory and that would be that
but no
we have this amazing urban drama one that says almost everything there is to say about important cultural dramatic events like
boxing perhaps
boxing
more boxing on tv it's summer nothing else to do can't get enough of this summertime blues
can't seem to find my goddam shoes
j
jh:
Trouble with the boxing match idea is that the two disputants are in quite different positions: the police officer is charged with ENFORCING THE LAW and the prof with OBEYING THE LAW.
OK now, time for indignant nasal whines recounting litanies of injustices--real or imagined--like that odious piece of sway-dough poetic offal, Ginsberg's "Howl"--committed by police officers in the past.
In some ways, however, I'll agree that in many areas of many US cities, the police (and border guards) are increasingly overmatched in weaponry compared with the arsenals at the disposal of vicious drug gangs often manned by illegal aliens. Maqny areas of many US cities are simply uninhabitable by decent law-abiding people, and those stranded by poverty or misfortune are routinely terrized by these lawless savages.
I think one possible solution to the chaos and rampant criminality in our cities (and on our borders) is semi-permanent occupation of these areas by national guard or regular army troops. Among other advantages, soldiers don't usually come from the areas in which they are posted, so there is less pressure to accommodate themselves to gang territorial rule of many neighbourhoods that plagues police efforts to fight crime in those areas. City administrators who fancy they can sustain "sanctuary cities," etc. should be faced with the cutoff of all federal funds to those cities (first among these defiantly corrupt administrators might be San Francisco's Gavin "If I Only Had a Brain" Newsom).
"many"
"terrorized"
(still getting used to this new keyboard)
I think Crowley has shown remarkable maturity throughout this entire episode. Of the three people involved in the fracas (Gates, Obama, and Crowley) he's the only one who can seemingly keep quiet. He doesn't even speak in the CNN video, but his hug of the black police woman speaks volumes. It's a beautiful moment.
That he's willing to meet with the president also speaks volumes.
I think it will be a real teaching moment for Gates and Obama, whose lives will be changed forever by this good man.
I still think Gates should apologize to Crowley's mother.
Kirby:
Yes, I'll agree that Crowley is showing an admirable magnanimity (if not pressured, say, by the idiot-girl mayor of Cambridge), though Gates and Obama are clearly using him to save face and to save themselves from further embarrassment--I'm not convinced that Gates will cease to be a smug, coddled prat in a pseudo-discipline or Obama a cunning, arrogant, and incompetent politician raked out of the most corrupt political cloaca in the country).
Jacques,
I think the Race, Gender, Class people have not only tried to even things up in these areas, but have actually flipped the categories of supremacy, and now aver the MORAL superiority of the formerly suppressed side. Elements of this are already apparent in Marx.
I think most of us are for gender and racial equality, and always have been, since the Founding, through the Civil War, and through the Civil Rights Marches. But we don't want a new superior set of better people, on account of the same dumb demographic criteria, only reversed.
Meanwhile, Obama can't bring himself to say anything against the regimes of the world that are completely monstrous like Burma's. Because he wants to focus on how bad America is, so that he change it into an elitist socialist country, in which those who've been suppressed, can be the new elite, and everyone else can be destroyed.
Obama is increasingly showing his cards wrt this problem in his thinking.
What he tries to do is to mobilize any given crowd through appealing to its prejudices through reverse discrimination.
He thought that most in SF would hate anybody religious or having guns, so he mocked those who cling to guns and to religion. That worked for that micro-clientele, but not for the nation, and it nearly cost him the election, but the Clintons didn't manage to hammer that fact home about Obama because they more or less have to use the same tactics, in order to get the vote, but Hillary's color (as Edwards' color) prevented him from going full bore on this. It's a problem with the Democratic party in general now that they have to use this reverse discrimination to appeal to the new sense of moral superiority that the traditionally suppressed now feel. They are better than everybody, and even above the law.
The remark on religions and guns didn't personally insult anyone, but libelled a larger group, roughly, the Appalachian hillbillies that the left imagines still sit over stills drunken with religion, as far north as western pennsylvania, while daring a snake to bite them.
It's an ancient stereotype. Like telling a Polish joke.
But it worked in San Francisco!
Now more recently Obama insults the police and he thought the whole nation would be with him on this, but this time he insulted a specific officer, and a specific department. So he got enormous flak. He's lost police departments nationwide, as well as numerous other constituencies, who are starting to perceive his reversed elitism. He sides with the criminals against the police, he thinks the police ARE generally more criminal than the criminals themselves. He sees criminals as a suppressed element, perhaps.
Now he's trying to pretend that doctors go into the business of taking care of people and will put a child through surgery just to make a buck. He sees doctors as criminal!
It's a grotesque and offensive characterization meant to mobilize a prejudice, but everyone is now aware of his tactics, and we are quite sick of them. It's just what Hitler did to the Jews, mobilizing a monstrous prejudice, in order to affirm the supremacy of a majority, against a minority, by criminalizing this new minority, making us hate the police and the medical establishment through unfair characterizations of them.
If he has anything else in his magic hat, he might try using it.
Indicating that he is for change, and that anybody who isn't with him is therefore regressive actually worked for one election.
But his tactics of divide and conquer are now seen for what they are, and they're pretty despicable.
It's just the same thing Hitler did with other clientele thrown under the bus.
Obama even tried to throw special education Olympics athletes under the bus for a cheap laugh on Letterman (I didn't see this, as I don't stay up that late). This time it was roundly booed, but it was still early on in his presidency, and people forgave him for it because the pattern of he and his Wise friends hadn't yet become apparent. But hating special education people is part of the elitist educated's prejudice. They do not see each person as an equal soul. They rank themselves as superior because they have superior minds (constant reference to the high IQ of the left is almost a sneer at everyone who isn't on the left at this point). Therefore, the special education people and special Olympics people go right under the bus. Peter Singer at Princeton believes the retarded should just be aborted up until age 3. No one on the left ever says anything about this (to be fair, Berube HAS, but only because he has a son who falls into this category -- it was one of Broob's few human moments where i actually liked him -- otherwise he is an elitist bastard just like all the rest). The idea is that all species are equal, and that there is nothing special about humanity. Therefore, in each species only the most fit should live. Everyone else should die.
Obama believes this along with the rest of his elite crowd.
I think America deserves to be run on different principles, or by at least someone with some higher principles. Meanwhile, we're stuck with this rabid bigot for another three years.
I hope Sarah Palin wins the next round. She may not be the most articulate individual in America, but she has some sympathy for economic and educational outsiders, and for disabilities folks, like her own son.
She has a heart, which in many ways is better than having a big heartless brain without any regard for those who haven't been to Harvard, or who are teaching at Harvard.
Amen to all that, Kirby; I didn't think Obama would be so overt so early about his radical agenda. He's cruisin' . . .
Ha!!
--Tom
Kirby, d'you think this jerk Tom can even think? Truth hurts, jerk, doesn't it--don't forget to stick your head in the toilet and flush, sh-t for brains! Foutu pedale!
Jacques... this hurts man.. why? Are ascribing the comments to the "anonymous" fellow as being from my very own mouth? If so you are mistaken. Although, I did find that one pretty funny. He/she does have a point about your Obama obsession.
--Tom
No, the anonymous isn't Tom.
Anonymous is a D- when he's on his game. Tom can rise far above that, and actually tell us much.
One could say much the same about Bush derangement syndrome--it is an obsession bordering on a personality disorder. However, I think Jacques' criticisms of our President are fair. He respects the office of the Presidency, and will respect Obama as president as long as he believes that he is acting in the best interest of our nation, in domestic matters as well as matters of defense and foreign policy. If not, I think Jacques is right to voice his concerns as an American citizen born to freedom and the obligation to remain vigilant.
Whether or not they are strongly disapprove of the President's choices and policy, most people would be sentient enough not to play into stereotypes about African American genitalia and sexual habits to make their point.
Shame on Anonymous.
Sorry Tom, for assuming all the anons are yours--guess the saboteur could use any of our monickers as well--Kirby, think stu could locate the troll via IP checks? Could it be max? Let's find out. . . .
Post a Comment